Understanding Michigan's New Cannabis Tax Legal Battle

Michigan is once again at the forefront of a significant cannabis policy debate—this time, challenging a newly introduced 24% wholesale marijuana tax already met with constitutional scrutiny. As the first court hearing takes place, the case garners national focus for its potential influence on cannabis pricing and implications for voter-approved legislation and fiscal policies nationwide.

Whether or not you consume cannabis or reside far from Michigan, this legal decision could shape how other states formulate, amend, and defend cannabis tax structures—potentially foreshadowing future industry legal confrontations.

Here’s essential information for Americans about this issue.

Details on Michigan’s Proposal

As part of its fiscal plan for 2025–2026, Michigan legislators sanctioned a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at raising funds for road enhancements. This tax targets transactions earlier in the supply chain, prior to dispensary availability.

Image 1

In addition, Michigan imposes the following taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis transactions (initiated by voter approval in 2018)

  • A 6% state sales tax

If this new wholesale tax is implemented, Michigan’s cannabis tax structure would become one of the most complex in the United States.

Reasons for the Industry Lawsuit

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) claims the tax is unconstitutional. Their argument hinges on a critical point:

The 2018 voter-sanctioned marijuana legislation cannot be altered without a supermajority vote.

Legalizing recreational cannabis through the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) fortified this law. Modifications require a three-fourths supermajority.

The new wholesale levy was passed with a simple majority instead.

Image 2

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol highlighted the stakes in comments to the Michigan Advance:

“As the main cannabis trade association, we're in court to safeguard the intentions of Michigan’s voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry groups further warn the tax would inflate costs, burden small businesses, and potentially drive consumers back to unregulated sources—a trend observed in states with elevated taxes like California.

The State's Rationale

Michigan's government contends the tax's legality based on:

  • The wholesale tax is new, not an adjustment of the 2018 voter-approved legislation

  • The legislature’s prerogative to establish taxes for budgetary purposes

  • Its objective is addressing road infrastructure, not revising cannabis policy

If judicial decisions favor the state, the tax could still be enacted by January 1, 2026.

Potential Consumer Impact

Americans beyond Michigan should take note, as cannabis tax models frequently influence each other across states. If this tax withstands the challenge:

  • Wholesale costs will surge

  • Retail prices may rise in response

  • Some consumers might revert to cheaper, unregulated markets

  • Smaller entities could face financial strain or consolidation pressures

If nullified, Michigan’s current, more economically moderate tax structure would remain.

Why This Case Holds National Importance

While the lawsuit proceeds in Michigan, its ramifications extend beyond state lines.

1. It scrutinizes voter-approved legislation boundaries

If lawmakers are permitted to enact taxes without supermajority consensus, it could redefine how ballot initiatives operate in all states employing them.

2. It could shape other states’ cannabis tax strategies

States handling underfunded infrastructure might adopt similar taxation if Michigan’s survives.

3. It underscores a persistent national issue: disparate cannabis tax rates

Certain states (like Oregon and Michigan) maintain relatively low cannabis taxes, retaining competitive legal products. Others (like California) grapple with high taxes fostering robust illicit markets.

Michigan’s lawsuit could serve as a prototype for how tax challenges are constructed in other jurisdictions.

Upcoming Developments

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has reviewed initial arguments and is anticipated to deliver a ruling shortly. The case might ultimately ascend to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Regardless of the verdict, the ruling’s impact will be profound—not just for Michigan’s cannabis enterprises, but for the broader interpretation and management of voter-endorsed legislation, burgeoning industries, and taxing power across states.

Image 3

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .